Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 13:33

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do you agree with Elon Musk's direction for the US Office of Personnel Management?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tomatoes Recalled Over 'High Risk of Illness or Death' - Newser
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
'It's such a dream': Top high school performers step out on Broadway - NPR
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Would you let your son wear leggings to school?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
At what point did you realize it was the right time to leave your job?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Inside the Vault – Upcoming Combat and Perk Changes - Bethesda.net